I worked on check mate puzzles per Attila. I spent 1.5 hours tonight working puzzles writing the solutions in a notebook. We discussed during on training session on Sunday to work on puzzles to help with the calculations. I have found that my calculation is lacking.

To do: I still need to analyze my game with Simon that I played last Monday.

I worked on 200 problems check mate problems. I played ILRE on team4545 league and lost.

Today I didn't go to the Coronado chess club. I was too tired from the long day on Tuesday and today was very full. My thoughts were to work on How to Reassess Your chess specifically on the Knights chapter test. After completing the test at the end of the chapter I started going through the solutions. Unfortunately  I found that I missed most of them-not understanding the positions and how the knight was key.

Today I watched a couple of videos on acerook playing blitz tourneys. I reviewed 1st chapter of How to Reassess your chess and played through 1 game and a position.

I am going back to focusing on my How to Reassess your chess in order to structure my study. Tonight I spent about 1 hour on The Bishop test on page 75. When I get back on Sunday, I'm going to work on a detailed study plan.

I've had a full week with work. I worked on about 6 puzzles at dinner thinking that I would go to the Chess Club. I did feel much like playing so I cut it short tonight.

Today was a very busy day as we were getting ready for Joseph's Eagle Court of Honor. I did get a short bit of time to study a few puzzles in the morning. I worked on about 5 puzzles in about 30 minutes.

I played 4 games of blitz. I won half of them.

I also looked through an endgame book on pawn endings.

I practiced about 30 minutes on puzzles. Today was the only day I had a chance to work on the line that Attila gave me that I would play Ron with. I was on the white side of the Sicilian dragon -- playing e4! I found only a couple of games, but most seemed to end in draw. I thought that O-O would solidify white more instead of the Bg5 version. I also struggled with the position and the variations around Bg5. I basically only could spend 40 min preparing looking for games and thinking about some plausible variations.

After the game Ron and I went over it. I pretty much lucked out at the end. I believe that my opponent had the  advantage with the extra pawns, but pawns were not very far advanced. It was a good game and interesting.

Later in the evening I spent some time analyzing the game thinking about some of the other side lines we could have gone through.

Before I went to bed, I worked on 10 tactical puzzles and solved most of them mentally.

I didn't feel very well after lunch so my chess study was very minimal.


I played about fifteen 3 min blitz games, winning about 10 of them. I have been using this type of practice to investigate openings. Unfortunately, the quality of play is very low and the opponents don't seem to get into good variations.

Today was very busy I did get a chance to study during the Super Bowl. I studied puzzles for about 2 hours.

I did manage to play a few blitz games but unfortunately I didn't do all that well. I did find that the nature of the Cheng's puzzle book book that they are very difficult with some that are subtle positional features.

I didn't play any blitz tonight. I did read an article on Chess.com by Silman on knight forks. There were some nice puzzles to solve as a part of the article.

I did work on some puzzles earlier tonight both in the Practical Chess Exercise.

Got home late from Troop meeting at 9 pm.

I was able to work on a couple of puzzles with the board setup. They turned out to be very hard, but worth working through a couple of variations.  It has been a little difficult coming up with some of the other side variations on what might be reasonable variations when there is not a forced line. I spent 20 min on puzzles last night.

I did play a couple of blitz games and followed up with checking with variations in my database. I ended up with playing about 13 games with just a bit over 50%.

I was very tired today not sleeping very well last night.

Today I played one bullet tourney and didn't do very well. Next I played in a 5 min blitz tourney and took 6th making too many mistakes.

I studied/solved 6 puzzles from Practical Chess Exercises. This time I set up the positions on a chess board and wrote out the solutions before moving any pieces.

Today I followed a few games from Tata Steel. I saw Nakamura lose his game to Carlson.

I worked on 3 puzzles in the Practical Chess Exercises paying special attention to thinking through variations to solve them.

I played 26 blitz games and about one third of them quick blitz. I reviewed a couple of games to assess what were the factors that contributed to winning and losing.

I did get a chance to review Sicilian Najdorf Bg5 variation.

I didn't get very much time as there were other chores and family activities to do. I'm looking forward to working on some chess exercises tomorrow.

Today I had a great lesson with Attila.

Major points we discussed out of the Power of Habit book that apply to chess improvement:
1) Look at the power of visualization
2) Writing a long of chess activity like the dieters will show patterns and make the activity conscious. Dieters experienced twice as much loss success than dieters that didn't write things down.

Primary pattern to work on improving: Good strategy (good position) and avoid bad move (blunder). Usually a tactical mistake.

We discussed that sometimes during a game they will be a psychological blow that blocks (blockades) our thinking process.

Attila has been working with a study on reviewing How to chose a move, by Soltis.

Attila discussed how his chess learning and coaching when he was younger. It appears that they studied entire games holistically and systematically instead of emphasizing particular concepts and how they apply in game play.

Important: Need to understand how/why we win & lose games. This applied to longer games as well as blitz if we want to improve.

Losing can also be a habit.
We discussed the value in working with puzzles and writing many variations and selecting the best move. This process needs to be worked on. Write down a thinking process before making decision.

To work on:
1) Visualize yourself winning a game, the good feelings of a dominate position prior to playing a game.
2) Log chess study and activities on the blog
3) Analyze games after playing them to determine reasons why winning & losing.
4) Study and analyze positions (and puzzles). Identify (write down) several variations 3-5 moves long to evaluate. This applies to any position in the game, end games as well as puzzles.

Day 1 of NM Memorial. I registered in the Open Section. I decided to play up to see how I could do. My expectation was to win at least one. I believe the avg rating was about 1900+ with a few of us below 1800.

My first game was against a player from Wisconsin. He was an older player and I hadn't look at his rating until well into the game. He played white and I played black. He played e4 and I decided to start out with the Sicilian. He played a version that I was not very familiar with and I quickly got into an inferior position and eventually lost the game.

It has been a while since I last posted. I have been working on my chess but only sporadically. I've been keeping up with my team4545 league matches and my correspondence chess.

Tonight I worked on getting ready for the NM Memorial. In my last training session with Attila, it occurred to us that my tactical training might be flawed. Fast tactical training only reinforces quick pattern matching and not calculation skills. I have been finding that my calculation ability has not being developed very well. We discussed looking at puzzles where I can take longer time to calculate variations and visualization.

I studied for about 5 solid hours with a combination of puzzles on chessworld.net and particular variations that I've studied with Attila.